Unpublished letter submitted to the Toronto Star

Re: Who will foot the bill for $28.5B transit plan? April 11, 2019.

Corporations have tunnel vision, only seeing responsibility in terms of one-way profits. All other costs are not on their radar screens. They fail to understand their broader social  and financial responsibility. Public expenses should be born by those who directly benefit from the services and use them. Continue reading →

Unpublished letter submitted to the Toronto Star

Re; Alberta oil, gas cleanup could reach $70B: report, April 9, 2019.

The fossils in the fossil fuel industry are strangely silent when it comes to ponying up for the cleanup costs of their mess. Governments have been trained to use taxpayers money to do this. They want all the gravy but none of the leftovers. Every industry in the world takes the same approach. When it comes to making money they’re first in line, when it comes to paying out their money to take responsibility for their products or their waste they are nowhere to be seen.  Each industry leaves behind a horrendous number of carcinogenic products as a result of their production processes along with a massive amount of physical cleanup. Industries have for centuries pumped their contaminated untreated waste water into the nearest watershed and dumped their waste in toxic landfills poisoning the rivers, lakes and oceans and making our drinking water undrinkable.

Again and again when industry is asked about this, they disavow responsibility and evade prosecution employing high priced lawyers and a legal system that is largely based on ‘voluntary’ compliance, which has simply been an escape clause for past two hundred years . Timid governments shield huge companies in the rich oil and gas sectpr to preserve a few hundred cyclical jobs. The only interest of these companies is in making money and avoiding responsibility – anything that gts in the way of that is a problem and a nuisance.

What we need in Ottawa, provincial politics and around the world are parties that will end the free ride for corporate businesses that have destroyed the world. Big industry has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are the enemy. Governments must establish ironclad ‘cradle-to-grave’ laws that govern all aspects of a products life-cycle. The industry should be fully legally and financially responsible for their products and more importantly for their waste. If high wages, pensions, healthcare, full-time work, environmental responsibility and every other aspect of business in relation to society were mandated by governments in legislation the benefits to us all would be infinitesimal. The public needs to take over as the fair-haired person of government. As it is we have the cart before the horse.

Taxpyers should never pay for the destruction of companies to our environment, our climate and our well-being or receive corporate welfare to get along. Business want the best of both worlds. It is high time they stared taking the good with the bad.  Let the fossils in the fossil fuel industry pay for the cleanup as they should.

Unpublished letter submitted to the Toronto Star

Re: Nuance aside, ban is wrong, Editorial, April 1, 2019.

The Star’s editorial takes the status quo position on Quebec’s progressive secularism banning of religious symbols in public. Their position misses the finer points of the argument that are important as well. They correctly defend the rights of minorities to equality under the law but they extend that equality to religion which is a problem. Although our constitution has a time honoured tradition of defending the rights of people to practice their religion, this has created massive problems for people throughout the ages. It is never that simple.

People’s religious beliefs deeply influence their behaviour whether in government, society or gender relationships. Religion is a pacifier for the once illiterate masses. The modern reality is that people’s religious beliefs dee[y influence their political beliefs whether they are majority or minority, Christian or non-Christian. This is one of the reasons that belief in religion is waning. Many of these beliefs are highly patriarchal, ancient and repressive not traditions to be preserved. The wearing of the niqab, the hijab and the burka are clear signs of the oppression of women in Islamic cultures. The opposition of the Christian right to abortion is another. Restrictions against homosexuality and adultery are others. By enshrining the right to practice religion openly we are enshrining the abusive oppression of religion contained within it. Most religions, Christian or non-Christian have subordinating demands on women but not on men.

Saying that the church and state are separate is ludicrous. The reason that we are in this position today is because of imperialist wars in the past that were fought on the basis of religious values. Our laws and democracy are framed in this context. The democratic state has long tried to separate religion from politics but without success.

Religion is so ingrained in the mentality of everyone that it cannot be ignored. Religious symbols in public are a constant source of psychological friction and unhealthy societal segmentation in a democratic society. The free practice fo religion, rather than being a unifier in society has been and unequivocal divider.

People are welcome to practice their religious beliefs in private as long as they don’t try to impose their religion on others. As history has shown us this is virtually impossible. This ban would apply to all religions – including the Catholic Church one of the largest socializers in the world.

Thus the reason for Quebec’s ban. It is for this reason that Quebec’s law is just – perhaps unknowingly – just the beginning of a long process of liberating people from the oppression of religious belief. If we truly are a modern, progressive society we should not support ancient mysticism and is various accoutrements but a belief in humanity and its power to govern our morality. If we did this, our world would be vastly improved.